What should (public) health insurance cover?
نویسنده
چکیده
In any system of health insurance, a decision must be made about what treatments the insurance should cover. One way to make this decision is to rank treatments by their ratios of health benefits to treatment costs. If treatments that are not offered by the health insurance can be purchased out of pocket, the socially optimal ranking of treatments to be included in the health insurance is different from this standard cost-effectiveness rule. It is no longer necessarily true that treatments should be ranked higher the lower are treatment costs (for given health benefits). Moreover, the larger are the costs per treatment for a given benefit-cost ratio, the higher priority should the treatment be given. If the health budget in a public health system does not exceed the socially optimal size, treatments with sufficiently low costs should not be performed by the public health system if treatment may be purchased privately out of pocket.
منابع مشابه
Attaining the ”Health for all” commitment. Which model for health insurance ? Some lessons from the European and USA experiences
In 1998 the Fifty-first World Health Assembly passed the "health-for-all policy for the twenty-first century". During this assembly the Member States of the World Health Organization (WHO) reaffirmed their commitment to the principle that “the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the fundamental rights of every human being”. Even if there is now a worldwide consensus...
متن کاملBasic versus supplementary health insurance: Moral hazard and adverse selection ¬リニ
a r t i c l e i n f o JEL classification: I13 D82 H51 Keywords: Universal basic health insurance Voluntary supplementary insurance Public vs. private insurance Adverse selection Moral hazard Cost effectiveness This paper introduces a tractable model of health insurance with both moral hazard and adverse selection. We show that government sponsored universal basic insurance should cover treatmen...
متن کاملWho should pay for assisted reproductive techniques? Answers from patients, professionals and the general public in Germany.
BACKGROUND Financing ART is variously regulated in the different countries of Europe. In Germany, coverage of assisted reproduction by statutory health insurances was restricted to 50% in 2004. We conducted a national survey among patients, professionals (physicians and other academics in IVF centres, psychosocial counsellors, medical ethicists, social lawyers, health politicians) and the gener...
متن کاملTradeoff Negotiation: The Importance of Getting in the Game; Comment on “Swiss-CHAT: Citizens Discuss Priorities for Swiss Health Insurance Coverage”
Swiss-CHAT’s playful approach to public rationing can be considered in terms of deliberative process design as well as in terms of health policy. The process’ forced negotiation of trade-offs exposed unexamined driving questions, and challenged prevalent presumptions about health care demand and about conditions of public reasoning that enable transparent rationing. While the experiment provide...
متن کاملSlovenian Experience on Health Insurance
Aperiod of changes in what had previously been public health insurance began in Slovenia in 1992. A new legislation introduced amixedpublic-private insurance, the share ofGDPallocated for health care insurance inSlovenia equaled theEUaverage, and the financing of the public health insurance has been balanced up – until now. For the first time since Slovenia gained independence, the compulsory h...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of health economics
دوره 26 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007